We have an Exchange 2007 server (1 server setup)

One user have problems to send mail to few customers. (He is the one ho send most emails)

There are three different errormessages:

#553 sorry, that domain isn't allowed to be relayed thru this MTA (#5.7.1) ##

#550 5.7.1 <name@domain.net>... Authentication required

#550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Anyone who have a solution?

pem

I'm using Exchange 2013, I using Yahoo! mail and Gmail as smart host. If I enable the "Proxy through client access server" on my send connector, I will receive 530 authentication error.

smtp114.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Remote Server returned '530 authentication required

mx.google.com Remote Server returned '530-5.5.1 Authentication Required. Learn more at 530 5.5.1 

If I disable  "Proxy through client access server", the mail can be sent from mailbox role server. is there anythings wrong with my config?

Thanks.

I wonder if anyone can help with the issue that I am currently unable to resolve. Each morning we have a number of clients that send us their Summary Network Reports automatically on a daily basis to my Exchange email account. These are the default automated SBS Daily Reports.

When viewing the HTML emails in Outlook their appear as normal and always display correctly. I have recently tried setting up my iPad and iPhone to my Exchange account to read the reports first thing on my iOS devices.

On the iOS devices the emails arrive but don't display as an HTMl email, instead they show as text. At the bottom of the emails there is a message 'This message was downloaded as plain text' and a button 'Download full message'. Once I click this button the message displays correctly.

I would like to understand what causes this as every other HTML email received works as normal and I don't have to click the button to display the message. Clicking this button is annoying and isn't ideal. I'm not sure if its iOS or Exchange which is causing this but I am desperate for a fix.

I am running SBS 2008 with Exchange 2007 SP3, my iOS devices are on iOS 6.1.3.

I'm sure someone out there knows how to fix this.

Hi All,

We have been running Exchange 2010 for some time now and never had any real issues with it. We have recently employed the services of a new E-Marketing company and they are trying to say we are blocking messages from them. Our previous company had no issues though. We set them up a new domainthat isn't linked to our own and I have added all required domains (the new and their internal domains) to the exceptions on our Firebox firewall. When we send out a campaign IE; an e-shot to say 45 external and internal people via their system, some recipients receive the messages and some don't. The e-marketing company say they are seeing the following NDR at their end for some recipients:

__RECEIVED_LOCALLY__,2013-02-12 16:08:12+0000,,e-mail address of sender,e-mail address of recipient,,,,,,,smtp,localhost (127.0.0.1),,,,,,VMTA-BRONZE,,,,,127.0.0.1,127.0.0.1 __BOUNCED__,2013-02-12 16:08:29+0000,2013-02-12 16:08:12+0000,e-mail address of sender,e-mail address of recipient,,failed,5.0.0 (undefined status),"smtp;571 Delivery not authorized, message refused",our webmail address (our external IP address),policy-related,smtp,localhost (127.0.0.1),smtp,senders IP address,our external IP address,"8BITMIME,SIZE,AUTH",42473,VMTA851,,,cosatto.com/VMTA851,VMTA-BRONZE,,

(I have removed some information in the bolded fields)

My argument is that the recipients sometimes receive the messages and sometimes they don't, it's very sporadic! So how can we be blocking them in any way? We don't have any filtering / edge subscription within our Exchange server so am baffled as to how we could block anything from them???

Any help / advice GREATLY appreciated!

Cheers

Jason - Cosatto Limited

Hi!

I just tried to configure domain security in Exchange 2013 in a test environment: two messaging organizations, each running a dedicated client access role and a mailbox server role. 

Domain security seems to be configured correctly - recipients running Outlook get that additional icon which says that the email 'was received securely'. In that scenario the mailbox server is sending the mail directly to the recipient domain. So no proxying via the local client access server takes place.

When I try to use the domain local CAS as proxy (Set-SendConnector -FrontendProxyEnabled $true) the mail stays in the mail queue. The LastError on the queue states: '... 451 4.7.3 The admin has temporarily disallowed this secure domain...'. The protocol log of the send connector states: 'Message to secure domain 'dom1.test' on send connector 'Outbound Proxy Internal Send Connector' failed because DomainSecureEnabled was set to false.'

I have no clue where that internal send connector could be configured. Or where the 'Outbound Proxy Internal Send Connector' can be seen.

Or is domain security just supported without using the frontend proxy?

Many thanks in advance!

Greetings,

Nils

Hi all

Its me again.

I am trying to update the inbuilt malware definitions according to the instructions in article.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj657471.aspx

& $env:ExchangeInstallPath\Scripts\Update-MalwareFilteringServer.ps1 -Identity <FQDN of server>

I am getting the following two events  see below on all the mailbox servers. I obviously cannot go into production Exchange 2013 RTM on Windows 2012 Servers and Domaincontrollers.

Log Name:      Application
Source:        Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS
Date:          1/29/2013 2:50:45 PM
Event ID:      6027
Task Category: None
Level:         Error
Keywords:     
User:          NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:    Removed To Protect The Innocent 
Description:
MS Filtering Engine Update process was unsuccessful in contacting the Primary Update Path. Update Path:http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
  <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS" Guid="{1BE3A000-EA09-4AB8-B0A0-30BBB6793D80}" />
    <EventID>6027</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-29T12:50:45.262896300Z" />
    <EventRecordID>120660</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation />
    <Execution ProcessID="2584" ThreadID="3752" />
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer>Removed To Protect The Innocent
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-20" />
  </System>
  <EventData>
    <Data Name="UpdatePath">http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate</Data>
  </EventData>
</Event>

Log Name:      Application
Source:        Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS
Date:          1/29/2013 2:53:25 PM
Event ID:      6024
Task Category: None
Level:         Information
Keywords:     
User:          NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:     Removed To Protect The Innocent
Description:
MS Filtering Engine Update process is checking for new engine updates.
 Scan Engine: Microsoft
 Update Path: http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
  <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS" Guid="{1BE3A000-EA09-4AB8-B0A0-30BBB6793D80}" />
    <EventID>6024</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>4</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-29T12:53:25.654390000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>120667</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation />
    <Execution ProcessID="2584" ThreadID="3752" />
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer> Removed To Protect The Innocent
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-20" />
  </System>
  <EventData>
    <Data Name="EngineName">Microsoft</Data>
    <Data Name="UpdatePath">http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate</Data>
  </EventData>
</Event>

Log Name:      Application
Source:        Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS
Date:          1/29/2013 2:56:07 PM
Event ID:      6030
Task Category: None
Level:         Information
Keywords:     
User:          NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:   Removed To Protect The Innocent  
Description:
MS Filtering Engine Update process is attempting to download a scan engine update.
 Scan Engine: Microsoft
 Update Path: http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
  <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS" Guid="{1BE3A000-EA09-4AB8-B0A0-30BBB6793D80}" />
    <EventID>6030</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>4</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-29T12:56:07.715314800Z" />
    <EventRecordID>120668</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation />
    <Execution ProcessID="2584" ThreadID="3748" />
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer> Removed To Protect The Innocent
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-20" />
  </System>
  <EventData>
    <Data Name="EngineName">Microsoft</Data>
    <Data Name="UpdatePath">http://forefrontdl.microsoft.com/server/scanengineupdate</Data>
  </EventData>
</Event>

Log Name:      Application
Source:        Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS
Date:          1/29/2013 3:48:03 PM
Event ID:      7003
Task Category: None
Level:         Information
Keywords:     
User:          NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:    Removed To Protect The Innocent 
Description:
MS Filtering Engine Update process has successfully scheduled all update jobs.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
  <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Filtering-FIPFS" Guid="{1BE3A000-EA09-4AB8-B0A0-30BBB6793D80}" />
    <EventID>7003</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>4</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-29T13:48:03.321784200Z" />
    <EventRecordID>120776</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation />
    <Execution ProcessID="2584" ThreadID="21120" />
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer>Removed To Protect The Innocent</Computer>
    <Security UserID="S-1-5-20" />
  </System>
  <EventData>
  </EventData>
</Event>

Regards

Bright

Hi,

I am not sure if this is the right forum to put across my question, but I am compelled to do so as it is a question regarding my mail content privacy.

I work in an MNC and very recently it was confirmed that my manager snoops on my incoming and outgoing emails. I felt it some time back where in he did not have to know a specific piece of information in my email but he knew about it. I confirmed it with a contact in the exchange team and he agreed to such practice.

Since, I can't override my manager's decesion to the exhange team, I would need help with is that a method by which I could control the monitoring. Some way to ensure specific mails do not land up in his mailbox for monitoring.

Thanks in advance.

Cheers!! Sumit Bhatnagar

Hi all. I am getting very sporadic bounce backs from people sending emails to my customer: #< #5.4.4 smtp;554 5.4.4 SMTPSEND.DNS.NonExistentDomain; nonexistent domain> #SMTP#. It is not a consistant fault but one that is seriously causing a problem as its always seems to be an important email.

It is only when external users are trying to send to my customer. External emails are fine.

I have look countless places and I still have not found what I am looking for. Can some one either point me to the right forum post or answer my question.

My dilemma is that there are 2 email addresses lets say they are 123@company.com and 234@company.com. These 2 email addresses need to be forwarded to 3 other emails so that if some one emails either of the 2 emails listed above they will get forwarded to 3 others lets say they are named kate@company.com, bob@company.com, and alex@company.com. I have tried many different ways to no success. Lastly there is no user for the 2 emails above. Just email address that will have incoming messages only.

I have tried creating a Distribution Group for the 2 emails then forwarding to a dummy email then having the dummy forward to the 3 others. No luck. I have tried creating a user for the 2 emails and having them forward to a DG dummy then having the DG dummy forward to the other 3. No luck either.

I am not sure what to try now, I may be way over thinking this but if any one can help out, it would be much appreciated.  

Did anyone ever manage to create a working receive connector for SSL/TLS (465)

I have created a receive connector using the client submission port (587), and it works perfectly using STARTTLS. However i tried to configure a receive connector for SSL/TLS, which is also according to international standards but could not get it to work using Mozilla Firefox.

The certificate is as far as i know no issue, as the common name is equal to the host name of the server. The CA has been added to the Thunderbird certificate store, and is working on the same server with the client submission port (587 STARTTLS).

Answers provided are coming from personal experience, and come with no warranty of success. I as everybody else do make mistakes.

I'm migrating from Exchange 2007 to 2013.  I currently have two mailboxes moved to the Ex2013 environment simply for testing.  We are using a Symantec.Cloud service for email encryption.  I have my send connector configured with the Symantec smart host for outbound email and my outbound mail tests successfully. 

I cutover my firewall to the Ex2013 server so I could test services before migrating the remaining mailboxes.  Everything works except inbound mail.  It's my understanding that the default receive connectors should be configured by default to receive mail.  I have also contacted Symantec.Cloud to verify that they have no knowledge of our internal servers.  MX records are pointed to them and they simply hand off to our public IP address.  I verified that my NAT rules are in place so Ex07 and my Ex13 servers both resolve to the same outside IP address. 

I can send internally between the two mailboxes that have been moved.  I can also initiate a manual SMTP transaction from the command line and that delivers to my test mailboxes.  So to be more specific it is the inbound mail FROM the outside world that does not work. 

I've read other posts with mail flow issues and people are always asked to run the connectivity analyzer and test inbound or outbound email but obviously with the Symantec.Cloud service in place this option doesn't exactly work for my troubleshooting. 

I do have split DNS but I've configured the appropriate DNS zone internally and I have successfully tested OWA, ECP, and Autodiscover internally and externally. Still no inbound mail flow from the outside world. I can also see in my firewall that my smtp rule is getting hits so Symantec.Cloud is still handing off email.  What could I be missing that would prevent my Ex13 server from receiving email from the firewall?  Also, if I go to my firewall and switch my inbound smtp rule back to the Ex07 server then try to send to my test mailboxes, that gets delivered successfully. 

Hi,
I have a 2013 installed and working - both with incoming mail and outgoing mail when using Outlook and similar clients.

No problems sending mail from and to either internal or external domains. However, I want to authenticate with the standard SMTP server with a username + password and send e-mail using "standard clients".

I cannot get this to work. In code, when I authenticate through SMTP (user/pass) and tries to send an email from "user@mydomain.com" to "user@anotherdomain.com", I get the error:

Mailbox unavailable. The server response was: 5.7.1 Unable to relay.

I don't really know how to set this up to get it working. In an existing Exchange 2007, I had no problem setting this up, but I cannot get it to work in 2013. If I add "*" to accepted domain, it works, of course, but that gives me an Open Relay.

I have a default send connector, mapped to the SMTP domain "*".

How do I configure so that all authenticated users can relay freely?

Hi,

We moved from exchange 2010 to exchange 2013, we need to configure mail relay connector so that exchange 2013 could receive emails coming from different sources (printer for scan to email, sharepoint....)

I followed an article to create a receive connector for that, I allowed anonymous users (even if on sharepoint and the printer we provide credentials for authentication), We also added the IP addresses of the printer and sharepoint on this receive connector.

It starts working, but after few hours or minutes (it's really random), it just stops working, I looked on error on exchange event viewer, and I found this: 

Warning event id 1035 : Inbound authentication failed with error LogonDenied for Receive connector Default Frontend ExchSrv. The authentication mechanism is Ntlm. The source IP address of the client who tried to authenticate to Microsoft Exchange is [Printer IP Address].

From the message I see that the receiver was "Default Frontend ExchSrv" and it is a "FrontendTransport" role. But my receiver I created is a "HubTransport" Role.

I went to the receiver "Default Frontend ExchSrv" and I enabled "Exchange Users" , it started working again. But I don't know for how long.

My question really is that on documentation for the mail relay for printers, It was mentioning to create a receiver with HubTransport role, but it seems it's the FrontendTransport role receiver that is receiving the request. Can someone explain this scenario to me? Do I still need the mail relay receiver I created?

Thank you.

-Mehdi

Hi Guys

Just done an Exchange 2003 to 2010 migration and cant get the 2010 server to receive new email, I can see this a common problem everyone is having and have looked through all posts and cant find the right answer.

I am able to send email its just the receiving part, I have done the following

• Set receive connectors to allow anonymous users
• Removed routing group connector
• Set the port forward on my firewall
• Created send connector which works fine as able to send mail

I have noticed on my exchange 2003 box there are some emails saying "Messages with an unreachable destination" these seem to be the mails I’m sending

can someone help?

exchange 2010 sp2

hello In my organisationnobody cant send email to all users except some management users 

how come there is 3 users that can send mail to all users . thay are not in the management list   hwo can i prevent them from sending 

thx

Dear all,

I am asked to restrict a group of users from sending external email, I have created a distribution group and added all the targeted users, and in Exchange management console under Hub transport I have created a transport rule.

What is happening is that withing the same period of creating the rule, it is working properly but the following day the users are able to send mails outside the Organization, I am wondering what could be causing this.

Your usual support will be highly appreciated.

Rgards

Michael

Dear all,

I have a problem with my customer regarding error log "Synchronization of some deletion failed (0-130)" . This synchronization of some deletion failed log have been flooded my customer mailbox. Doing some research and found out that this is known problem from Microsoft and there is no solution yet. Appreciate if someone could share their experience or workaround on this problem.

 Link

Microsoft Support :http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2606009
Microsoft Forum Blogger :http://anandthearchitect.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/outlook-2010-sync-issues-folder-is-full-of-sync-logs-synchronization-log-and-modification-resolution-with-exchange-2010-mailbox/

Hi guys,

I have an Exchange 2007 and 2013 coexistance scenario. I have an Edge Transport, with FPE, and a HT/CAS in Exchange 2007 with SP3 and CU1.

In Exchange 2013 I have 2 CAS and 2 MBX.

Just now I am running tests from my Edge server, checking delivery to a Mailbox Server in 2013 using Telnet. However, I am seeing in the message delivery logs 5.7.1 "Client was not authenticated" when the message is attempted to be sent to the Mailbox server.

EdgeSync is apparently working fine.

Thanks for your help!

Good Morning,

I see on the current feature set  for Exchange Online Protection it doesn't allow end users to administer their own spam settings.  It looks like this feature was in FOPE before.  Are there plans to include this?  Also, how can you administer this system without having to unblock quarantined messages all the time? Is there a demo that we can view the features in action?

--Steve

Hi,

when trying to set root access permissions with inheritance on public folder on Exchange 2013 it stops after a while with: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.

Public folders size is about 4,5GB and the server have 16 GB RAM with about 20 users, so that should be plenty. 

What i have noticed is that ISS Worker process frequently grows to about 6-7 GB in memory use under this operation.

When I check public folders now it has changed permissions on the first 20-25 folders before it stopped.

Any solution for this?